Putting our best foot forward
Visit the Smart Solutions in Tough Times campaign homepage
Seamus had an opinion piece in the Belfast Telegraph on Wednesday and it seems to have gone down really well. Lots of good feedback about it and we had a briefing with Minister Foster yesterday and her officials mentioned they had read it. It was also lovely to get an email from the Chairperson of Home-Start Antrim saying how pleased she was to see their work showcased. Lots of groups have gotten in touch to offer case studies of the sector at its best and I am loving writing them up and dropping them casually (or not so casually...) into our briefings with politicans, officials and journalists. By the time we get to briefing Assembly committees we will have a brochure thick with examples of how the sector is making a difference in every aspect of life here.
I got a story from First Housing in Derry yesterday that made me well up and a great email from RSPB clearly outlining the amazing work they are doing. Its no secret that I am really proud to work in this sector and the examples you have been sending through are reminding me why. Keep them coming folks - lisa.mcelherron@nicva.org







Comments
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Sat, 21/08/2010 - 14:26
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/opinion/working-together-is-the-only-w...
Thu, 02/09/2010 - 08:22
Lisa and colleagues at NICVA. Great idea to get the blog going and interesting to note that NICVA seem to be the only organisation leading the debate on the likely impact of cuts. I feel the input to debate from elected representatives in particular is incredibly poor.
I think highlighting and showcasing smart solutions in touch times is a great idea but there's a flaw. Unfortunately I still sense that many within the sector see the whole debate around cuts as an opportunity to only promote and strengthen the position of their own organisation and it's axiomatic within the sector that everyone assumes their organisation and services can't be done without. I fear that what is going to happen is incresing competition and jockeying for position and maintenance of funding rather than organisations taking an honest look at themselves , the communities and needs they are meeting and identifying how those needs can be identified and met in the most sustainable way into the future.
As we know that cuts are going to happen , it is also worth reminding ourselves that the majority of community and voluntary sector organisations here are exclusively voluntary and I think i'm right that exclusively voluntary organisations also involve the most volunteers numerically. We need to think about how local communities can be supported and encouraged to form, maintain and develop these smaller groups and involve people as volunteers given the imminent challenges. A future with less funding could mean these types of groups becoming more important in the future. We need to be having a debate here about the " Big Society" and considering how its stated aims sit with the cuts which will likely make it harder for people to get involved in local community activity.
In the future we have to get away from the model that states organisations follow a certain development trajectory from exclusively voluntary , growing , seeking more grant aid , employing staff etc and my personal view is that we have also within the sector have to address the sectarianisation of development and funding where we have paralell but seperate groups. We need to inculcate an awareness that sometimes its time to call it a day and organisations should finish their activity, close down , hand assets to someone else and those involved move on and develop other organisations, activities and ideas. I don't think we're very good at the closing down and moving on here.
Just a few random thoughts and I look forward to engaging with the ongoing NICVA programme
Mon, 06/09/2010 - 10:45
I think Nigel makes a good point about the importance of local voluntary organisations. We have seen government look to centralise service delivery (based on economies of scale thinking) , but my understanding of the Big Society is 'local provision at a local level' (based on ecomies of flow).
Advice NI is engaged in systems thinking work and what we have found is that economies of scale/centralisation of services lead to front office / back office splits; centralised work processing ‘factories’; where the client is de-coupled form the service. Work is batched, queued and handed over, with delays and errors in-built into the system.
Economies of flow on the other hand focuses on understanding what people want and need from the service; expertise is then deployed at the point of transaction; getting the work done faster and more efficiently.
The Big Society;
“It’s time for something different, something bold – something that doesn’t just pour money down the throat of wasteful, top-down government schemes.
http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/latest-news/2010/07/pm-kick-starts-big-s...
From this positive perspective, the CVS network in Northern Ireland could be part of radically transforming service delivery here.
Thu, 21/10/2010 - 11:29
I agree with most of the comments made, but i also see the current economic changes with reference to N Ireland as an opportunity. The problems arise from definations surrounding front line services. What is a front line service with reference to the community /voluntary sector?
With welfare reform, and a economic downturn the demand from the public ,will be increased localised advice services,but current government thinking is for centralised advice services out of the control of local communities.
Most people who operate within the C/Vs will tell you that they can save money, but they are not permitted to do so by government departments, this might sound strange but it is based on reality
i will give one example, i recieve 6 bills every quarter from BT each bill has a £9 payment charge, BT also advice customers that the could save £36 per year by paying by direct debit thus saving not only £216 per year but the bank charges etc on top of that, plus the time involved both by the C/Vs and civil servants. The DSD demand what they term hard copy invoices,and bank statements, and operate a policy of reimbursement, i am sure that alot of other C/Vs people could tell similar stories, but the point i make is that the C/V sector are efficient both in terms of delivery of services and financial management. while goverment departments are easteful and inefficient.
my defination within the community & voluntary sector of what is a front line service, is this, those organisations whos only mandate is to deliver services that meet the needs of local people.
Not those organisations whom i call (development shadow) whos only mandate is to meet the needs of civil servants
the only test is, if development shadow organistions disappeared tomorrow would local people notice that they had gone, or ever existed
Post new comment