By Positive Steps Conference from NICVA
Published on 01 Aug 2005
Information session at the 'Postive Steps' Conference on 8 June 2005 by Una McKernan and Fancea O Neill from NICVA.
Information Session (b)
Core Costs and Full Cost Recovery
- Some employees may choose to use the Inland Revenues salary sacrifice scheme and funders are refusing to meet the costs of this.
- Funders are refusing to meet costs for mortgages and rent.
- There are toolkits and training available to help organisations use full cost recovery effectively.
- It is very difficult to plan a budget for seven – ten years as costs for certain things may change eg heating. Organisations need to carryout a sensitivity analysis, which is when you identify things, like oil or electricity, which might be sensitive to change over the funding period. Time required to carry out full cost recovery.
- All future applications should if possible adopt full cost recovery.
- Adopting a reasonable approach.
- Theory and Practice and the gulf between the two.
- Funders and applicants require training.
- Diversity of organisations and relevance for all.
- Better to reject a project / programme or change outcomes,than under fund it.
- Different funders have very different approaches to funding and what to expect from funded groups.
- Some good progress has been made in areas of monitoring and proportionally by the VCU.
- It is very frustrating that statutory funders all have very different approached – there should at least be consistency across government.
This page has been viewed 7312 times since it was published.