Core Costs and Full Cost Recovery

By Positive Steps Conference from NICVA

Published on 01 Aug 2005


Information session at the 'Postive Steps' Conference on 8 June 2005 by Una McKernan and Fancea O Neill from NICVA.

Information Session (b)

Core Costs and Full Cost Recovery

  • Some employees may choose to use the Inland Revenues salary sacrifice scheme and funders are refusing to meet the costs of this.
  • Funders are refusing to meet costs for mortgages and rent.
  • There are toolkits and training available to help organisations use full cost recovery effectively.
  • It is very difficult to plan a budget for seven – ten years as costs for certain things may change eg heating. Organisations need to carryout a sensitivity analysis, which is when you identify things, like oil or electricity, which might be sensitive to change over the funding period. Time required to carry out full cost recovery.
  • All future applications should if possible adopt full cost recovery.
  • Adopting a reasonable approach.
  • Theory and Practice and the gulf between the two.
  • Funders and applicants require training.
  • Diversity of organisations and relevance for all.
  • Better to reject a project / programme or change outcomes,than under fund it.
  • Different funders have very different approaches to funding and what to expect from funded groups.
  • Some good progress has been made in areas of monitoring and proportionally by the VCU.
  • It is very frustrating that statutory funders all have very different approached – there should at least be consistency across government.

This page has been viewed 7312 times since it was published.





Comments


We will only publish comments, not contact details on our website.
Any other information will be used for internal purposes only, and not sold, rented, or passed on to any third parties.